đŸ•ī¸ Autumn How do I report content? Just saw the N word being used as a username. :/
đŸ—œī¸ Mx Lol. Here comes the thought police. How can any normal 21st century person be okay with illegal words, animals, plants or people?
Login or register your account to reply
đŸ•´ī¸ Matthew Townsend Illegal? A normal 21st Century person doesn't have to be okay with anything. There's certainly nothing wrong with forum moderation by the people hosting them.
🌘 Alana because I'm transgender, and it honestly just fukin wears me down to see slurs thrown around casually. stopped using a forum I liked because one of the users had "tr*nny" in their name. it just sucks, you know? I'll go somewhere else, and then the racists and people who are okay with racists will stay. evaporative cooling, if you will. check out decriminalizenatur... btw.
🔚 Bort Simpson This is exactly why censorship is a terrible idea. I'm under no obligation to approve of, celebrate, or accept your interpretation of reality. I would go so far as to argue that your sexual identity has resulted partly from aggressive online censorship that painted any criticism of your identity expression as "hate speech." May I suggest that you reflect on your fragility.
🌚 Nlggers You make some good points.
đŸ—œī¸ Mx First off, there is no such thing as "transgender". You can mutilate your body all you want and take all the pharmaceuticals you can, you still won't be able to change your gender. You're just going to look weird and condemn yourself to a lifetime of social agony. Secondly, nobody owes you comfort and happiness. If words offend you, then you're already vulnerable to all forms of communication and you should stay away from people in general - both online and offline alike.
đŸ•´ī¸ Matthew Townsend If transgender isn't a thing, are we rolling back intersex too? Do we go back to chucking hermaphrodites off cliffs? Are we going to be like Iran with there 0% homosexuality rate? What are people like Caster Semenya?
đŸ—œī¸ Mx Intersex is an anomaly of the chromosomes - an unfortunate genetic condition. Intersex people can do nothing to change that condition, much like regular people can do nothing to change their gender. Nobody is "trans"! You are that what you're born. I don't want anyone thrown off a cliff. However, if you tell me that you woke up this morning feeling that your gender changed, I'd advise you to seek mental help and not mutilate your body. Also, kindly stay out of education!
đŸ”ģ Trinity ah, feck off. it's pretty standard scientific consensus that this stuff is valid: health.clevelandcl.... but, yes, the ability to endure slurs is a necessity in order to participate in intellectual conversation. to me it's odd though that something like the n-word is permitted on a seemingly professional site like this :shrug:
đŸ—œī¸ Mx Let's not be gullible! Transgenderism doesn't exist in nature. Homosexuality does, but not transgenderism. I think your "scientific consensus" has an underlying agenda.
🐊 Andromeda Pie Sooo if something doesn't exist in nature it doesn't exist in humans? Lmao.
đŸ”ģ Trinity Humans are, as far as we know, unprecedented. Computers (as we know them) do not exist in nature, yet we can build them. Our brains are pretty complicated compared to most other species. Glitches, like being a woman despite being born as a man, should be expected.
đŸ—œī¸ Mx "Glitches" being the keyword here. Everyone is entitled to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. However, people with mental "glitches" should stay out of education. Nobody under 13 should be exposed to anything remotely sexualized, let alone any sexuality with glitches in it.
đŸ”ģ Trinity Since when is transgenderism sexualized? Gender as a social concept is beyond what one's genitals are. If glitches like these are so common, let's think of them as features. The bugfixes are considered torture and it's not compromising any security functions. It's possible to address human sexuality without any form of perversion. Let's tell kids that there are people like them and that they aren't alone if they feel... wrong.
đŸ—œī¸ Mx Transgenderism is a mental disorder that exists on a scale so minuscule that it makes no sense to include it in grade school education. Otherwise, we have to include Trekkies, Wiccans, Voodoo practitioners and all types that believe they're somehow different than everyone else.
🤔 David > we have to include Trekkies, Wiccans, Voodoo practitioners and all types that believe they're somehow different than everyone else || This is a false equivalence and you know it. On top of that, your focus on content being presented as "sexualized" when it's purely informative (how is explaining what transgender means sexual/sensual??) presents a bias in your perspective. Rather than deplore it as a sexual issue or perversion, perhaps present evidence-based claims
📉 Bill This discussion of "transgenderism" shows the true power of propaganda in modern day society. Where were transgender people centuries ago?
đŸ”ģ Trinity The nazis were the ones who burned much of the medical documentation of transgenderism. They easily set us back a century in our understanding of the condition.
đŸ•ī¸ Autumn > Sumerian and Akkadian texts from 4500 years ago document transgender or transvestite priests known as gala and by other names. en.m.wikipedia.org...
📉 Bill Cool never heard of those. Sound like enochs
🐊 Andromeda Pie This is where they stop responding or accuse you of being nervous or aggravated lol
đŸ—œī¸ Mx Centuries? There were virtually zero transgender people up until the early 2000s.
🐊 Andromeda Pie If you took a minute to Google it you will be satisfied in knowing you're wrong. But you won't and we know why. You would rather spend your energy on hate and bigotry. Go ahead, prove me wrong. Google it. Buy a book. Read. Learn.
🐊 Andromeda Pie Just Google it dude. You can even hit I'm feeling lucky.
🐊 Andromeda Pie Wow what an epic own. Making me think you were sincere. Gasp
📉 Bill She pwned u man. *They have trained her well
🌚 Nlggers I disagree with your views but I respect that they are what you believe to be true and the fact that you advocate for what you believe is likely rooted in good intentions. It's my view that gender does not exist and that biological sex is determined by chromosomes. I believe genital mutilation is an abhorrent treatment for the mentally ill and my hope is that this practice will be eliminated within my lifetime.
đŸ”ģ Trinity I too believe in the abolishment of gender but probably in a dramatically different way. If you think sex is determined by chromosomes, what about the (somewhat atypical) third sex chromosome in many? It's possible to be XY, XX, XXY, XYY, etc. Doesn't that go against the idea of any sort of binary in terms of sex?
đŸ—œī¸ Mx Those chromosome abnormalities are exceptionally rare, and they're unfortunate but abnormalities nevertheless. Some people are born blind. Does that mean that eyesight is a spectrum and a choice, and one can alter it with their mind?
đŸ”ģ Trinity No, but while the lack of eyesight is a physical ailment, being born as the wrong gender is more of a psychological ailment. Sure, scientists in a thousand years or so will probably have a pill to cure gender dysphoria. But for now, eh. If they look like a dude, and dress like a dude, they're a dude to me. There's no epidemic of trans-committed crime, they're actually more likely to be killed: channel4.com/news/...
đŸ—œī¸ Mx Those people exist and they're entitled to life, happiness and a right to be employed. Just please don't show me "articles" about gender euphoria being normal and something that can happen to anyone. It's a severe (though non-violent) mental disease and it should not be normalized.
🤔 David And how did share an article about "gender uphoria being normal and something that can happen to anyone"? I have not read any contributions that are attempting to "normalize" trans attitudes *in the framing that you present--that is, that as trans becomes "popular" then more people will attempt it*. Rather, what I read is an acknowledgment of their situation. Nobody can "become trans" just like the terrible argument that people can "become gay"
📉 Bill Sure you can become gay if you experiment a bit with prostate stimulation.
đŸ”ģ Trinity i wish, it'd mean i could date more of my guy friends
🌚 Nlggers That's interesting. I had not heard of this. You have have opened my mind to a new possibility in telling me this. I will spend some time reading and to the degree that I am able remain open to the possibility that I may not have the full picture.
Chicken Waffles +1 for brutal truths about life
🌘 Alana 1) I get more girls than you; 2) I hope you have a nice day
🔚 Bort Simpson Boasting about a high sex count makes you seem like a typical arrogant sex-crazed male
đŸ”ģ Trinity It's a zoomer thing, you wouldn't get it. All of us are sex crazed. World's ending anyway
📉 Bill To each his own. I enjoy long term monogamous relationships between man and woman. Hope your day is well also!
🌘 Alana absolutely, to each their own. ty for the well wishes!
👉 LÊo I will play devil's advocate and say that unfortunately some moderation is still needed in today's society. I agree with you: it is archaic to have to police which words people use. I try to see this policing as an act of kindness towards people that for one reason or another may be sensitive to a given word. My wife has Romani ethnicity so the expression "gypped" hurts her a little every time she hears it. "Oh, but she can just ignore it!" Yeah, that's not how brains work.
🤔 David Like many things, it seems to be a necessary balancing act. Take some of the forums that you or I find to be engaging and thoughtful (eg SSC, Hacker News, etc.)--poor content and drivel still needs to be removed if it breaks simple guidelines. However, we need to allow free thought and discussions if any of us wish to expand our own knowledge and discover new perspectives. Critical thinking requires challenges.
🌚 Nlggers I agree with this sentiment. I am concerned with the direction western tech platforms are taking with regard to censorship. My anecdotal experience has been that in the early 2000s censorship was more prevalent among companies outside of the US (Daily Motion for example) and with the introduction of American companies offering similar services (YouTube) things became more free. Now the opposite has become true with Google introducing programatic censorship via Perspective API
Leeks So my questions sideways about this discussion are: why did you choose this username? Is it intentionally to be inflammatory? And if so, why is that a priority? Does it stem from a need for attention? I doubt anyone can seriously defend the worth of exercising free speech to use slurs. People who choose usernames like this misuse the free speech argument as a bulwark for 1) needing to cause a stir wherever they appear to feel important or 2) actually being racist or whatever
Tmp So is that the point you're trying to get across with your username?
🌚 Nlggers I think in part my feelings towards the pervasiveness of censorship online did motivate my decision to pick this username. Certainly I would say it is my primary motivation.
Tmp And would you say you're helping the cause now? I'm honestly interested. I definitely see how censorship is a very slippery slope, but I'm also not the type of guy who'd jump at your username just because it's up for grabs. Also, what's your secondary motivation?
🌚 Nlggers I suppose because I'm curious to gauge the way tech workers interact with someone who they may disagree with from a moral or ideological standpoint while I attempt to share information and have discussions in a well intentioned manner. If my username provokes discussion of censorship I'm not sure if that will help my cause. Maybe it will, or maybe it will not. Anyhow I'll try to make quality posts until I'm inevitably removed.
🤔 David Perhaps (in an odd way) I can understand how simply choosing your username is an effective form of protest. I personally find the word offensive, and yet acknowledge the idea you are standing for.
đŸ—œī¸ Mx You're probably going to be the first account I follow here, not because of your username but because of the quality of your posts. Thanks for sharing the browser privacy list! I'll be checking out the degoogled chromium today.
🌚 Nlggers Best of luck! My first suggestion is that you install the "Get CRX" extension. This will allow you to more easily sideload extensions which must manually be unpacked as a result of the removal of various Google APIs. In my humble opinion this is by far the worst hassle of the Ungoogled Chromium browser but the gains in user privacy are well worth the extra few minutes required to install extensions.
📉 Bill With such cheap hosting and no monetary incentive on this site, why would this need to implement censorship? Will "offensive" usernames or slurs prevent others from joining in discussion? There's no upvotes or downvoted to raise this content to the top which would be toxic. It will just get lost in the noise of the crowd
🌚 Nlggers I suspect the introduction of censorship is motivated by the lust for ideological domination perhaps more so than by economic pressures (advertisers and so-forth).
📉 Bill I'm sort of glad someone like you is behind this username