C4nn4r So far this place is looking pretty good, however, I am sceptical as to whether or not it will catch on with today's crowd as many people seem to have very little to no concentration, and seem incapable of reading more than 200 characters of text. I love the text-only look this place has going for it as well, it's incredibly refreshing, and unique.
Login or register your account to reply
Martijn To me the real question is more about how much of "today's crowd" Sublevel really wants to "catch". A lot of the blog posts I have read from people who are disappointed with where Twitter is going mention how the fun and tight community in its early days made it such a pleasant place on the internet. If has no plans of selling Sublevel or raising huge amounts of funding, why would he even want to attract millions of users? Why would we, the users, want to attract millions of users?
🏒 Lucian Marin I designed and built Sublevel with eight billions people in mind.
Martijn I'm kinda afraid of what Sublevels constant shared discussions would turn into with 8 billion people going at it. I think the concept might break down, even if the site itself would have no problem with it.
🙄 Doug Belshaw For some reason, that reminds me of the start of Ender's Game. :-)
Eric Is that film worth the watch? Its been lurking in my Netflix suggestions
C4nn4r Honestly, I could not agree more with this.
🏒 Lucian Marin Sublevel truncates messages larger than 255~275 characters so they can be easily accessible. If someone's post looks interesting you open it up and read it fully. I doubt people are capable of reading only very short messages.
Bas I agree on the refreshing bit. But sites like Medium are an indication that there's more than a little interest in long form copy that's actually interesting, as opposed to your run-of-the-mill clickbait list. Also I appreciate the fact that Sublevel's structure seems to trigger replies. Communication between people instead of random postings.
Eric The content on Medium is mostly uninteresting drivel which is written as if its a life changing thing to read. The look & feel of the articles might seem high quality but the actual flesh is rarely anything special.
Alin Rautoiu That's not really a Medium problem, but a problem of contemporary storified journalism. A lighter, shallower offshoot of gonzo and New Journalism.
Bas Well, it's user generated content. So as with every service offering USG, the more successful it gets, the more difficult it becomes to find the gems (like YouTube, Flickr, etc). But the fact it is succeful in the first place is an indication people like to read.
Belle Or that people like to write but don't want the pressure of maintaining their own blog.
Bas Possibly. The interface is arguably one of the finest around, so why bother?
Belle Because you own your content, control the experience, and can build your own audience. But I can see why people would opt for Medium instead.
Eric You are right, this today made me chuckle: medium.com/urban-e... There are good articles on Medium, it's just their discovery is often difficult & it's hard to get past the try-hard change-your-life 'stories' which dominate the site.