🏒 Lucian Marin Meta and Twitter charge users around $12 per month, not year and still serving you ads. That's insane. Everyone should move to Mastodon and Subreply.
👽 Paul Webb Does Subreply have image/video support?
1y, 42w 5 replies
🏒 Lucian Marin I can implement support for pictures, but the price will be $1 per picture.
1y, 41w 3 replies
Login or register your account to reply
🐢 Keb i think it's better without pictures/videos. it's what makes subreply unique. and is inline with the emojis-for-avatars idea
1y, 17w reply
😀 Tom I personally don't mind that price, but I have no pictures that I want to post. I like the text-only aspect of the site too. I feel like adding pictures might just make Subreply look more like Twitter or Facebook.
··· 1y, 41w 1 reply
😀 Kev Nookz i think if pictures or videos was to be added then any posts with pictures or videos would be added to own feed. Keep them out of the main feed. Otherwise just keep it text-based.