🔚 Bort Simpson
The most compelling argument I've seen is from the University of Alaska Fairbanks: "The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building." ine.uaf.edu/wtc7