You know what subreply desperately needs? More precise time indicators on posts. "198ms" just isn't cutting it
Login or register to reply
It can only be done with JavaScript like clicking on "2w ago" then converting UTC timestamp to your local time and replacing "2w ago" with "Jun 1, 8:03 AM". Clicking timestamp goes to the reply now.
yeah, I'd agree, It'd make it feel more realtime
Would second/minute increments be better?
Give me picoseconds or give me death. Or cake, I'll also accept cake in lieu of picoseconds.
"198ms" instead "1s" is used as a benchmark to see how fast the server responds. The cake is free here. :)
Planck time, or what are we even doing here?!