That awkward moment when Apple mocked good hardware and poor people
Login or register to reply
I don't see anything wrong with using an older computer. Sure, newer software often expects newer hardware and things might go slower than usual, but I don't think that warrants a full computer upgrade every year (and if you ask me, software developers are to blame). I'm personally using a 7 year old desktop; I've changed the motherboard and added more RAM, but that's it. I do have a newer laptop, but it's much nicer to type on a mechanical keyboard and look at a 24" screen.
I don't either, so long as the computer is usable / not slow. Something can be said about software always demanding more though. OS X has largely stayed the same yet it's hardware requirements have gone from 128 MB RAM (Cheeta) to over 2 GB RAM (Lion). It makes me wonder what takes up all that memory. Both my machines have 16 GB RAM and I'm looking to replace my laptop soley because it has 4, which makes it a bit slow at times. Honestly, I'd also blame phones for driving this
Ouch. This was some marketing gone very badly. Although in the last few years Apple products have gotten less user serviceable. Even the new Mac Mini now has RAM soldered to the motherboard! I'm typing this on a Late 2012 Mac Mini which originally came with 8 GB of RAM but I upgraded to 16. The old non-retina MacBook Pro (still available) has some user serviceable parts but the Retina models are more locked down. This is the really sad thing; Apple can, and used to, do better